Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of Juul Compatible Pods adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to find the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we must do to solve the problem of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.